Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dieleman, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Deurloo, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2, 223-245 (2000)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098002168
© 2000 Urban Studies Journal Limited

The Geography of Residential Turnover in Twenty-seven Large US Metropolitan Housing Markets, 1985-95

Frans M. Dieleman

Faculty of Geographical Sciences, University of Utrecht, PO Box 70.115.3582 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands, f.dieleman{at}geog.uu.nl

William A. V. Clark

Department of Geography, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024, USA, wclark{at}geog.ucla.edu

Marinus C. Deurloo

Faculty of Environmental Sciences, University of Amsterdam, 1018 VZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands, m.c.deurloo{at}frw.uva.nl

Previous research on variations in mobility rates across metropolitan areas, documented the link between immigration and local mobility, and the way in which local mobility creates 'hot' and 'cold' housing markets. The research in this paper confirms and extends those analyses by examining the interplay between the relocation process and the structure of metropolitan housing markets. The results show that more than three-quarters of the turnover is generated by renters and most of this by households under 35 years of age. It also shows that variations in mobility rates can be predicted by variations in new construction, though it is clear that ultimately it is the underlying population growth which is the critical variable. House prices also vary across metropolitan areas and are influenced by city size, but the major determinants of variation in house prices are household income (a measure of upward pressure on prices) and the tenure structure of the local market. The results show that turnover per se is at least as important as price in creating opportunities for tenure change and residential relocation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
G. Painter, L. Yang, and Z. Yu
Heterogeneity in Asian American Home-ownership: The Impact of Household Endowments and Immigrant Status
Urban Stud, March 1, 2003; 40(3): 505 - 530.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
W. A. V. Clark, M. C. Deurloo, and F. M. Dieleman
Housing Careers in the United States, 1968-93: Modelling the Sequencing of Housing States
Urban Stud, January 1, 2003; 40(1): 143 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]