Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guy, S.
Right arrow Articles by Henneberry, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research

Simon Guy

School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, University of Newcastle, Claremont Tower, Newcastle upon Tyne, NEI 7RU, UK, s.c.guy{at}ncl.ac.uk

John Henneberry

Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK, j.henneberry{at}shiffield.ac.uk

In their treatment of development, researchers in the property sector tend to adopt positivist methodologies which emphasise the application of rational decision-making techniques by utility-maximisers within a mainstream economics paradigm. While considerably increasing our understanding of the development process, such research offers a partial view of its subject from a particular perspective. Recently, alternative methodological and theoretical approaches have evolved which strive to understand the wider institutional context of the development process. The paper critically reflects on these institutionalist approaches in order to develop a research framework which blends economic and social analyses of property development processes. The paper draws upon (re)interpretations of the authors' recent research to address the following points. First, that the economic structuring of development is a product of and, in turn, affects social processes. This is illustrated by a consideration of the price mechanism in the property market. Secondly, that social structures and processes are as important as their economic equivalents in 'explaining' property development. This is addressed by a discussion of the ways in which recent shifts in the social organisation of the property sector are reframing the strategies of development actors, leading to new structures of property provision and use. The paper concludes by arguing for the need to develop an understanding of property development processes which combines a sensitivity to the economic and social framing of development strategies with a fine-grain treatment of the locally contingent social responses of property actors.

Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 13, 2399-2416 (2000)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980020005398


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
K. J. Ruming
Development Configurations and Planning Negotiations: A Case of Fringe Development in Sydney, Australia
Urban Stud, June 1, 2009; 46(7): 1461 - 1483.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Henneberry and C. Roberts
Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK
Urban Stud, May 1, 2008; 45(5-6): 1217 - 1241.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
N. Triantafyllopoulos
Does Land Property Structure Affect Local Development Patterns? Evidence from a Greek Tourist Area
Urban Stud, April 1, 2008; 45(4): 797 - 824.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cambridge J EconHome page
R. McMaster and C. Watkins
Economics and underdetermination: a case study of urban land and housing economics
Camb. J. Econ., November 1, 2006; 30(6): 901 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. J. Smith, M. Munro, and H. Christie
Performing (Housing) Markets
Urban Stud, January 1, 2006; 43(1): 81 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. S. Han and Y. Wang
The Institutional Structure of a Property Market in Inland China: Chongqing
Urban Stud, January 1, 2003; 40(1): 91 - 112.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
M. Ball
Cultural Explanation of Regional Property Markets: A Critique
Urban Stud, July 1, 2002; 39(8): 1453 - 1469.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. Guy and J. Henneberry
Bridging the Divide? Complementary Perspectives on Property
Urban Stud, July 1, 2002; 39(8): 1471 - 1478.
[Abstract] [PDF]