Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Denning, S.
Right arrow Articles by Grieco, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 37, No. 10, 1865-1879 (2000)
DOI: 10.1080/00420980020080471
© 2000 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Technology, Dialogue and the Development Process

Stephen Denning

Knowledge Management, The World Bank, Room MC-4-711, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, sdenning{at}worldbank.org

Margaret Grieco

Transport Research Institute, Napier University, Redwood House, 66 Spylaw Road, Edinburgh, EHIO 5BR, UK, m.grieco{at}napier.ac.uk

Development activities are in crisis. Beneficiaries and clients are vocal in their demand for a higher level and better quality of participation in the development decision-making process. Development agencies are also questioning their own role and are concerned at the mixed results of development assistance, particularly in Africa. Support for international assistance in donor countries is fragile. Just at this point of crisis, new approaches and technologies have become available which can accommodate the more integral participation of clients and beneficiaries in the interior organisation of the development agencies. Correspondingly, there is a growing awareness that the mixed results of expert technical assistance to the developing world is in part the result of inadequate dialogue and discussion between expert and client. The paper describes the emerging development paradigm in which better communication-not only expert-to-client, but also client-to-expert and client-to-client-is at the core.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?