Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henneberry, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No. 9, 1439-1465 (1999)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098992863
© 1999 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Convergence and Difference in Regional Office Development Cycles

John Henneberry

Departement of Town and Regional Planning, The University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S102TN, UK, j.henneberry{at}sheffield.ac.uk

In this paper, data and analytical techniques not hitherto employed for the purpose have been used to explore the particularities of the role played by finance capital in influencing the spatio-temporal patterning of office construction in British regions. There was little variation in the supply of long-term finance to the property sector by investment capital over the last property cycle. Investors' influence was nevertheless substantial, but was exerted indirectly via the property price mechanism. Rents, reflecting demand for accommodation from local industrial capital, set the basic dynamic of regional property markets. However, investment yields were relatively insensitive to regional variations in rental trends. The interaction of rents and yields produced a price-induced set of regional office development cycles which were paradoxically both more similar and more different. Temporal cyclical convergence contrasted with growing interregional differences in office construction. These effects were contingent upon banking capital supplying sufficient short-term debt finance to support developers' responses to price signals and upon the rented sector forming an important part of the wider office property market.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Henneberry and C. Roberts
Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK
Urban Stud, May 1, 2008; 45(5-6): 1217 - 1241.
[Abstract] [PDF]