Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Filion, P.
Right arrow Articles by Warriner, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No. 8, 1317-1347 (1999)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098993015
© 1999 Urban Studies Journal Limited

The Entrenchment of Urban Dispersion: Residential Preferences and Location Patterns in the Dispersed City

Pierre Filion

School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada, pfiliore{at}fes.uwalerloo.ca+

Trudi Bunting

Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada, tbunting{at}fes.uwaterloo.ca

Keith Warriner

Department of Sociology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada, wnrr{at}uwaterloo.ca

The paper portrays three aspects of urban dispersion: urban structure, residents' location and land-use preferences, and social ecology. To explain the dynamic inherent in this form of urbanisation, it suggests an explanatory model concentrating on shifts in the respective importance of space, place and proximity associated with the passage from traditional monocentric to dispersed urban form. The paper draws its empirical substance from the Kitchener Census Metropolitan Area, one of the most dispersed metropolitan regions in Canada. The Kitchener case study highlights the defining characteristics of a dispersed urban structure: high automobile dependence, a scattering of origins and destinations, and a resulting absence of pronounced accessibility gradients. The paper also reports the results of a survey which indicates a harmonisation of residents' preferences with the main features of dispersion. The case study ends by mapping the residential location patterns of two groups with a disproportionate influence on new urban development: high income households and families with children. Their concentric distribution is consistent with survey results. In the light of the prevailing transport-land-use relation and of residents' location choices and expressed preferences, the paper foresees a further entrenchment of the dispersed urban structure. The paper closes by explaining the limited success of most intensification policies and by exploring the possibility of injecting more diversity into the dispersed landscape in order to accommodate a growing variety of lifestyles.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
A. Schneider and C. E. Woodcock
Compact, Dispersed, Fragmented, Extensive? A Comparison of Urban Growth in Twenty-five Global Cities using Remotely Sensed Data, Pattern Metrics and Census Information
Urban Stud, March 1, 2008; 45(3): 659 - 692.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
L. Sigelman and J. R. Henig
Crossing the Great Divide: Race and Preferences for Living in the City versus the Suburbs
Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2001; 37(1): 3 - 18.
[Abstract] [PDF]