Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hotchkiss, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zobay, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No. 7, 1079-1093 (1999)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098993105
© 1999 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Employment Impact of Inner-city Development Projects: The Case of Underground Atlanta

Julie L. Hotchkiss

Department of Economics, School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA30303, prcjlh{at}langate.gsu.edu

David L. Sjoquist

Department of Economics, School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA30303, prcdls{at}langate.gsu.edu

Stephanie M. Zobay

Department of Economics, School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA30303, prcsmz{at}langate.gsu.edu

This paper makes use of a unique data set to explore the issue of whether inner-city residents are more likely to be hired by a new inner-city development than non-residents. A selection model with partial observability is specified and estimated. This partial observability model allows us to control for self-selection at the application stage and to obtain unconditional estimates at the hiring stage. We determine, holding individual and neighbourhood characteristics constant, that while inner-city residents are less likely to be considered 'hireable', their greater propensity to apply for jobs at this development means that they were at least as likely as non-residents to both apply and be hired. We also tentatively conclude that distance between an applicant's residence and the location of the development does not appear to have been an issue in the application decision.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?