Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Skaburskis, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No. 13, 2199-2215 (1999)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098992386
© 1999 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Modelling the Choice of Tenure and Building Type

Andrejs Skaburskis

School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada. Fax: 613-545-6905. E-mail: skabursk{at}fred.surp.queensu.ca

A multinomial logistic (MNL) model and a naive nested logistic model are estimated to relate differences in household size, age, income and housing prices to differences in the choice of tenure and building type. The estimated models show that the demand for lower-density options decreases with a reduction in household size and increases with increasing age and real income. Higher rents increase the demand for owner-occupied single-family detached houses. Higher price levels for the ownership option shift demand toward all of the higher-density options, particularly toward high-rise rental apartments. The key assumption underlying the MNL model is examined and shown to not hold true. However, the differences in the predictions made by the two models are too small to matter in the study of the choices among the major building types. Issues regarding the choice of models are discussed in the conclusions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
M. C. Colom and M. C. Moles
Comparative Analysis of the Social, Demographic and Economic Factors that Influenced Housing Choices in Spain in 1990 and 2000
Urban Stud, April 1, 2008; 45(4): 917 - 941.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
M. Moos and A. Skaburskis
The Probability of Single-family Dwelling Occupancy: Comparing Home Workers and Commuters in Canadian Cities
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2008; 27(3): 319 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. A. Barrios Garcia and J. E. Rodriguez Hernandez
Housing and Urban Location Decisions in Spain: An Econometric Analysis with Unobserved Heterogeneity
Urban Stud, August 1, 2007; 44(9): 1657 - 1676.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
A. Skaburskis
New Urbanism and Sprawl: A Toronto Case Study
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2006; 25(3): 233 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Yates and D. F. Mackay
Discrete Choice Modelling of Urban Housing Markets: A Critical Review and an Application
Urban Stud, March 1, 2006; 43(3): 559 - 581.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
H. A. Morrow-Jones and M. V. Wenning
The Housing Ladder, the Housing Life-cycle and the Housing Life-course: Upward and Downward Movement among Repeat Home-buyers in a US Metropolitan Housing Market
Urban Stud, September 1, 2005; 42(10): 1739 - 1754.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
W. A. V. Clark, M. C. Deurloo, and F. M. Dieleman
Housing Careers in the United States, 1968-93: Modelling the Sequencing of Housing States
Urban Stud, January 1, 2003; 40(1): 143 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]