Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wacquant, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No. 10, 1639-1647 (1999)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098992746
© 1999 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Urban Marginality in the Coming Millennium

Loïc Wacquant

Collège de France and the Department of Sociology, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, loic{at}uclink4.berkeley.edu

This paper sketches a characterisation of the regime of urban marginality that has emerged in advanced societies since the close of the Fordist era, highlighting four logics that combine to produce it: a macrosocietal drift towards inequality, the mutation of wage labour (entailing both deproletarianisation and casualisation), the retrenchment of welfare states, and the spatial concentration and stigmatisation of poverty. The rise of this new marginality does not signal a transatlantic convergence on the American pattern: European neighbourhoods of relegation are deeply penetrated by the state and ethnoracial tensions in them are fuelled, not by the growing gap between immigrants and natives, but by their increasing propinquity in social and physical space. To cope with emergent forms of urban marginality, societies face a three-pronged alternative: they can patch up existing programmes of the welfare state, criminalise poverty via the punitive containment of the poor, or institute new social rights that sever subsistence from performance in the labour market.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Uitermark and J. W. Duyvendak
Civilising the City: Populism and Revanchist Urbanism in Rotterdam
Urban Stud, June 1, 2008; 45(7): 1485 - 1503.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
China ReportHome page
K.-m. Lee, H. Wong, and K.-y. Law
Social Polarisation and Poverty in the Global City: The Case of Hong Kong
China Report, January 1, 2007; 43(1): 1 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
V. C. Adair
US Working-Class/Poverty-Class Divides
Sociology, December 1, 2005; 39(5): 817 - 834.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Contemporary Criminal JusticeHome page
J. M. Hagedorn
The Global Impact of Gangs
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, May 1, 2005; 21(2): 153 - 169.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
A. Roy
Paradigms Of Propertied Citizenship: Transnational Techniques of Analysis
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2003; 38(4): 463 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EthnographyHome page
J. Auyero
The Hyper-Shantytown: Neo-Liberal Violence(s) in the Argentine Slum
Ethnography, July 1, 2000; 1(1): 93 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]