This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stenson, K. Articles by Watt, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Governmentality and 'the Death of the Social'?: A Discourse Analysis of Local Government Texts in South-east England

Social Policy Research Group, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ, UK, kstens01{at}buckscol.ac.uk

Paul Watt

Social Policy Research Group, Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire HP11 2JZ, UK, p.watt{at}uel.ac.uk

Writers from within the Foucauldian govern mentality school have characterised recent governmental trends, associated with neo-liberal political rationalities, as manifestations of the death of the collectivist and universalist character of the 'social'. However, the unfolding of these developments varies both between and within nation-states. Drawing upon a discourse analysis of two local government texts from a local authority district in south-east England, the paper emphasises that at this local level the 'social' is reformulated rather than displaced in the way that the grand narrative of the 'decline of the social' implies. In both documents, albeit in different ways, neo-liberal discourse operates in tension with a continuing emphasis upon appearing to maintain equitable and universally legitimate service provision. This amounts not to the death, but rather to a reformulation, of the social.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Mumford Towards a Fiscal Sociology of Tax Credits and the Fathers' Rights Movement Social Legal Studies, June 1, 2008; 17(2): 217 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Hutchinson Countering catastrophic criminology: Reform, punishment and the modern liberal compromise Punishment Society, October 1, 2006; 8(4): 443 - 467. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Allender, D. Colquhoun, and P. Kelly Competing discourses of workplace health Health (London) , January 1, 2006; 10(1): 75 - 93. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Stenson Sovereignty, biopolitics and the local government of crime in Britain Theoretical Criminology, August 1, 2005; 9(3): 265 - 287. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Cheek At the Margins? Discourse Analysis and Qualitative Research Qual Health Res, October 1, 2004; 14(8): 1140 - 1150. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Armstrong A Risky Business? Research, Policy, Governmentality and Youth Offending Youth Justice, August 1, 2004; 4(2): 100 - 116. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. E. Chunn and S. A. M. Gavigan Welfare Law, Welfare Fraud, and the Moral Regulation of the 'Never Deserving' Poor Social Legal Studies, June 1, 2004; 13(2): 219 - 243. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Higgins Calculating climate: 'advanced liberalism' and the governing of risk in Australian drought policy Journal of Sociology, September 1, 2001; 37(3): 299 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. SIMON The `Society of Captives' in the Era of Hyper-Incarceration Theoretical Criminology, August 1, 2000; 4(3): 285 - 308. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. CROWTHER Thinking about the `Underclass':: Towards a Political Economy of Policing Theoretical Criminology, May 1, 2000; 4(2): 149 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF]