Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darcy, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 36, No. 1, 13-26 (1999)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098993709

The Discourse of 'Community' and the Reinvention of Social Housing Policy in Australia

Michael Darcy

Department of Social Policy and Human Services, University of Western Sydney, Macarthur, PO Box 555, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia, m.darcy{at}uws.edu.au.

Recent developments in Australian social housing policy encompass a larger role for non-government housing providers. The new emphasis is mediated and supported by the discourse of 'community' housing. 'Community' is invoked as an ideal by liberal critics of the centralised state, and conversely, by critics of liberalism who pose it as an alternative to individualism and the abstract formalism of the liberal state. Much of the rhetoric of community housing in Australia has emphasised its claimed potential to demonstrate ways in which social housing management can be made more accountable and responsive, as well as more equitable and efficient, but the evident contradictions in the discourse raise questions concerning the reasons for, and likely outcomes of, state sponsorship of community housing. This paper employs 'textually oriented discourse analysis' to examine key policy documents which have informed the development of community housing policy in Australia, and demonstrates linkages between these discourse samples, and the international tendencies in the societal order of discourse identified by Fairclough as 'democratisation', 'commodification' and 'technologisation'.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
F. Miraftab and S. Wills
Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa
Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2005; 25(2): 200 - 217.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
F. Miraftab
Public-Private Partnerships: The Trojan Horse of Neoliberal Development?
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 1, 2004; 24(1): 89 - 101.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
F. Miraftab
The Perils of Participatory Discourse: Housing Policy in Postapartheid South Africa
Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2003; 22(3): 226 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]