This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ingram, G. K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Patterns of Metropolitan Development: What Have We Learned?

Research Advisory Staff, The World Bank, Room N-7-043, 1818 H Street, NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, gingram{at}worldbank.org

Urban development patterns in both industrial and developing countries with market-oriented economies show strong regularities consistent with basic urban location theory. Large metropolitan areas are converging to similarly decentralised structures with multiple sub-centres, decentralised manufacturing and more centralised service employment. Decentralisation is increasing the reliance on road-based urban transport for both passengers and freight. Land markets are strong determinants of decentralisation, and the development patterns of cities without land markets differ greatly from cities with even poorly functioning land markets. Demand patterns in urban housing are similar across cities, but supply-side impediments vary widely, resulting in a wide range of the ratio of housing prices to income. The efficiency of public infrastructure provision also varies widely across cities and across sectors within cities. Large metropolitan areas in low-income countries will continue to grow as these countries urbanise.

Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 7, 1019-1035 (1998)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098984466


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Jones Remaking the Monopoly Board: Urban Economic Change and Property Investment Urban Stud, October 1, 2009; 46(11): 2363 - 2380. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Shearmur and B. Motte Weak Ties that Bind: Do Commutes Bind Montreal's Central and Suburban Economies? Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2009; 44(4): 490 - 524. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Vega and A. Reynolds-Feighan Employment Sub-centres and Travel-to-Work Mode Choice in the Dublin Region Urban Stud, August 1, 2008; 45(9): 1747 - 1768. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Polese, F. Rubiera-Morollon, and R. Shearmur Observing Regularities in Location Patterns: An Analysis of the Spatial Distribution of Economic Activity in Spain European Urban and Regional Studies, April 1, 2007; 14(2): 157 - 180. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Polese and R. Shearmur Is Distance Really Dead? Comparing Industrial Location Patterns over Time in Canada International Regional Science Review, October 1, 2004; 27(4): 431 - 457. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Shearmur and C. Alvergne Regional Planning Policy and the Location of Employment in the Ile-De-France: Does Policy Matter? Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2003; 39(1): 3 - 31. [Abstract] [PDF]