Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dick, H.W.
Right arrow Articles by Rimmer, P.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 12, 2303-2321 (1998)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098983890
© 1998 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Beyond the Third World City: The New Urban Geography of South-east Asia

H.W. Dick

Department of Business Development and Corporate History, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia, hdick{at}econfac.unimelb.edu.au.

P.J. Rimmer

Department of Human Geography, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia, primmer{at}coombs.anu.edu au.

Scholars, as area specialists, have typified south-east Asian cities as Third World cities and emphasised their uniquely south-east Asian or even national characteristics. This paper will argue that the early decades of decolonisation which gave rise to this perspective were in fact a transitional phase. In the late colonial period south-east Asian cities were already becoming more like Western cities. Since the 1980s, in the era of globalisation, this process of convergence has re-emerged. Clearly, there should now be a single urban discourse. This is not to deny that south-east Asian (or Third World) cities have distinctive elements. The problem is the paradigm which shuts out First World elements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Robinson
Inventions and Interventions: Transforming Cities An Introduction
Urban Stud, February 1, 2006; 43(2): 251 - 258.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
R. E. Pizarro, L. Wei, and T. Banerjee
Agencies of Globalization and Third World Urban Form: A Review
Journal of Planning Literature, November 1, 2003; 18(2): 111 - 130.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
N. A. Phelps, D. McNeill, and N. Parsons
In Search of a European Edge Urban Identity: Trans-European Networking among Edge Urban Municipalities
European Urban and Regional Studies, July 1, 2002; 9(3): 211 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]