Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baldock, R. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 35, No. 11, 2063-2083 (1998)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098984006
© 1998 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Ten Years of the Urban Programme 1981-91: The Impact and Implications of its Assistance to Small Businesses

Robert Owen Baldock

Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development, Business School, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, London, NW4 4BT, England, UK, RBaldock{at}mdx.ac.uk

This paper presents the findings of a comparative study of small business land and premises support schemes operating under the Urban Program me (UP) in the London boroughs of Wandsworth and Haringey. The results of this study are used to evaluate whether politics makes a difference to policy outcomes in local areas. The article indicates that there are crucial differences in the policies of the two boroughs studied and that several key elements of the two boroughs' different approaches to small business support were particularly successful, such as low business rates and the targeting of niche market businesses. However, both boroughs failed to integrate effectively their UP policies within a wider economic development strategy. Given that the type of small business support policies examined here continue to form an important part of contemporary local economic policy, the author argues that these findings offer important lessons. It is recommended that this issue of co-ordination must be addressed by all bodies administering local economic support policies in the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
H. Thomson, R. Atkinson, M. Petticrew, and A. Kearns
Do urban regeneration programmes improve public health and reduce health inequalities? A synthesis of the evidence from UK policy and practice (1980-2004)
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, February 1, 2006; 60(2): 108 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]