Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imrie, R.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 34, No. 9, 1401-1418 (1997)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098975484
© 1997 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Law, Legal Struggles and Urban Regeneration: Rethinking the Relationships

Rob Imrie

Department of Geography, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK, r.imrie{at}rhbnc.ac.uk

Huw Thomas

Department of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University of Wales, PO Box 906, CardiffCF1 3YN, UK, thomashl{at}cf.ac.uk

The interrelationships between law, legal processes and urban regeneration have been little addressed by researchers of urban studies, while few have acknowledged the centrality of law as one of the core facets involved in the restructuring of the built environment. Rather, it has tended to be taken as 'given', as an underpinning of socio-institutional actions rather than being conceptualised as constitutive of them. In seeking to redress this imbalance, the paper considers the role of legal processes in urban regeneration through an exploration of the multiple and contested terrains of one of the core tools of urban regeneration, the compulsory purchase order (CPO). In exploring the interplay between urban renewal and CPOs, the paper begins by providing a brief overview and critique of the claimed value-neutrality of the Anglo-American tradition of law and legal processes, while outlining alternative ways of conceiving of the multiple interrelationships between law and socio-spatial processes. In a second section, we deploy case-study material to illustrate and discuss the socio-legal processes underpinning the CPO. We develop the argument, following Chouinard, that the legal discourses, practices and institutions of CPOs are powerful factors in perpetuating relations of social authority, power, exclusion and oppression.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
H. Thomas
Book Review: Oren Yiftachel, Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006. 368 pp. ISBN 081223927X, US$69.95/GB{pound}45.50 (hbk)
Planning Theory, March 1, 2008; 7(1): 112 - 115.
[PDF]