Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, N.
Right arrow Articles by Robertson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 34, No. 4, 561-578 (1997)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098975925
© 1997 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Housing Renewal, Urban Policy and Gentrification

Nick Bailey

Housing Policy and Practice Unit, Stirling University, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK, p.n.baily{at}stir.ac.uk

Douglas Robertson

Housing Policy and Practice Unit, Stirling University, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland, UK, d.s.robertson{at}stir.ac.uk

Understanding the impacts of housing renewal policies has become an increasingly complex task. First, evaluation must recognise the changing urban context within which policies operate, notably the revitalisation of some inner-city areas through the process of gentrification. Secondly, and more importantly, housing renewal policies should be viewed in the wider context of urban policy. Yet competing frameworks are available for judging success in urban policy terms. These take opposing views of whether gentrification should be considered a desirable outcome. The article illustrates these points by drawing on a recent evaluation of the impacts of the Housing Action Areas programme in Scotland. It shows that contrasting approaches to implementing renewal were adopted in the two main cities and that the impacts of renewal varied as a result. Judgement of the 'success' of each approach is shown to depend upon the framework used. The findings also suggest that the state may play a major role in influencing the process of restructuring under way in many cities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
Shenjing He
State-sponsored Gentrification Under Market Transition The Case of Shanghai
Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 2007; 43(2): 171 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
S. Buzar, P. E. Ogden, and R. Hall
Households matter: the quiet demography of urban transformation
Progress in Human Geography, August 1, 2005; 29(4): 413 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Meligrana and A. Skaburskis
Extent, Location and Profiles of Continuing Gentrification in Canadian Metropolitan Areas, 1981-2001
Urban Stud, August 1, 2005; 42(9): 1569 - 1592.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
R. Atkinson
Introduction: Misunderstood Saviour or Vengeful Wrecker? The Many Meanings and Problems of Gentrification
Urban Stud, November 1, 2003; 40(12): 2343 - 2350.
[PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
C. Hamnett
Gentrification and the Middle-class Remaking of Inner London, 1961-2001
Urban Stud, November 1, 2003; 40(12): 2401 - 2426.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
P. E. Ogden and R. Hall
Households, Reurbanisation and the Rise of Living Alone in the Principal French Cities, 1975-90
Urban Stud, February 1, 2000; 37(2): 367 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]