Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milne, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Market-type Mechanisms, Market Testing and Market Making: A Longitudinal Study of Contractor Interest in Tendering

Robin G. Milne

Department of Political Economy, University of Glasgow, Adam Smith Building, Glasgow G12 8RT, Scotland, UK, RG.Milne{at}socscigla.ac.uk.

Market testing is evaluated in the context of market-type mechanisms, for the efficiency gains it achieves. It has been part of public policy in the UK since 1979, and mandatory for defined support services, first in central government departments, then in the National Health Service and finally in local government. The policy is evaluated for its impact for three typical services, in terms of the government's ability to secure contractor interest in tendering. Success has been mixed, and government efforts to stimulate contractor interest have had a marginal impact. Substantial cost savings can be made from market testing, but management should be left to choose which support services are subject to the discipline of the market.

Urban Studies, Vol. 34, No. 4, 543-559 (1997)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098975916


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?