Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ennis, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 34, No. 12, 1935-1954 (1997)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098975150
© 1997 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Infrastructure Provision, the Negotiating Process and the Planner's Role

Frank Ennis

Department of Environmental Planning, University of Strathclyde, 50 Richmond Street, Glasgow G11XN, UK

While acknowledging the importance of considering infrastructure as a critical feature in the development process, this paper suggests that a deeper study of the issues involved can offer new insights into the role of planners and the functioning of planning systems. An awareness of the problems of implementation and the importance of understanding the significance of negotiative practice in the process is critical here. The essential argument is that, because traditional planning was founded on concepts of modernity, it was assumed that implementation was not a concern. The author suggests that negotiations have long been a feature of planning systems which need further and wider consideration. An ideal model for negotiating practice—positional bargaining—is examined to provide a means for assessing the papers included in this collection. In acknowledging that the negotiating strategies examined in the case study papers are a product of the socio-political context, the paper proposes that a mechanism for cross-cultural comparison needs to be devised and applied in order that the capacity to generalise across a diversity of circumstances is made possible.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?