Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pugh, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 34, No. 10, 1547-1595 (1997)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098975358

Poverty and Progress? Reflections on Housing and Urban Policies in Developing Countries, 1976-96

Cedric Pugh

School of Urban and Regional Studies, Sheffield Hallam University, Pond Street, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK

The Habitat II conference in June 1996 was more determined by retrospect and prospect than by the discussions during the several days in Istanbul. The policy outcomes were fashioned by reforms and research in the mid 1980s leading to the 'new urban agenda', the Global Strategy for Shelter, and the environmentalism from the Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit in 1992. At Istanbul, much of this was endorsed and converted into 'action plans'. To the extent that 'action plans' are compatible with national political and institutional conditions, they may influence a prospective future. Policy has become much more comprehensive and complex than in the Habitat I forerunner at Vancouver in 1976. The complexities were not fully acknowledged in Istanbul. They range from the inherent political conflicts in policy-based advice and financial support to the uncertainties of markets and macroeconomic events in a liberalised international economy. This paper evaluates widely in retrospect, in prospect and in the circumstances of post-1986 reforms. It is written from the perspectives of political science, economics (both orthodox and heterodox), and the social science of institutions. On-location work in east Asia, south-east Asia, south Asia, east Africa and Mexico have also influenced ways of thinking. Library work was undertaken in India, Kenya, Mexico, Sri Lanka, Singapore, Australia, Britain and in the archives of the Ford Foundation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
O. Alonso-Villar
Large Metropolises in the Third World: An Explanation
Urban Stud, July 1, 2001; 38(8): 1359 - 1371.
[Abstract] [PDF]