Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bentick, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 9, 1729-1732 (1996)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098966583
© 1996 Urban Studies Journal Limited

The Differential Incidence of an Urban Land Tax Depends on the Travel Intensities of Substitutes for Land

Brian L. Bentick

Department of Economics, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia. Fax: + 61 8 2231460; e-mail: bbentick{at}economics.adelaide.edu.au

There is an extensive literature on the incidence of the real property tax. In 1990 Pasha considered the incidence of an exclusive tax on urban land rents. He concluded that such a tax would initially impact on consumers of housing, but that the changes in spending induced by the tax would cause its burden to be shared between consumers and landowners according to the elasticity of substitution between land and other market goods, and the location of the land with respect to the urban margin. This note shows that, in order to impose any burden on consumers, the urban land tax needs to be supplemented by planning controls to prevent consumers on the urban margin shifting to the rural area in order to escape the tax. It also shows that the incidence of the tax between consumers and owners of intra-marginal land depends on the 'travel intensity' of the goods which are favoured by its substitution effects, and that these need to be specified.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?