This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wu, F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Changes in the Structure of Public Housing Provision in Urban China

Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Wales College of Cardiff, P.O. Box 906, Cardiff, CF1 3YN, Wales, UK. WUF{at}cfac.uk

Housing provision in a socialist country is generally characterised by the dominance of public housing. However, provision of public housing is a complicated process, which involves various social agencies. In the case of China, the simple notion of 'state provision' covers huge differences between municipally-managed and work-unit housing. The lack of understanding in the structure of public housing provision has led to unsuccessful efforts in promoting the 'commercialisation' of housing in recent years. This paper, adopting a perspective of structure of housing provision (SHP), attempts to examine the changes in public-sector housing in China and to reveal the critical role of state work-units in the SHP. Housing reform has led to some significant changes in the SHP. The transformation, however, is far from a process of commercialisation or privatisation of public housing stock. On the production side, work-units do withdraw themselves from direct involvement in housing construction. However, on the consumption side, the low incomes of state workers, due to the political economy, have forced the work-unit system to remain as an indispensable part of the SHP. The increasing role played by state work-units shows the contradiction embedded in a socialist market economy—i.e. the reproduction of labour through market mechanisms and the persistence of public ownership of production. The changes certainly have profound implications for the nation's urban development and urban spatial structure.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.-m. Li and Z. Yi The Road to Homeownership Under Market Transition: Beijing, 1980-2001 Urban Affairs Review, January 1, 2007; 42(3): 342 - 368. [Abstract] [PDF]

				X. Chen and J. Sun Sociological Perspectives on Urban China: From Familiar Territories to Complex Terrains China Information, November 1, 2006; 20(3): 519 - 551. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S.-M. Li Housing Tenure And Residential Mobility In Urban China: A Study of Commodity Housing Development in Beijing and Guangzhou Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2003; 38(4): 510 - 534. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. Wu Migrant Housing in Urban China: Choices and Constraints Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 2002; 38(1): 90 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Y. P. Wang Urban Housing Reform and Finance in China: A Case Study of Beijing Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2001; 36(5): 620 - 645. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Zhu The Changing Mode of Housing Provision in Transitional China Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2000; 35(4): 502 - 519. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W.-S. Tang Chinese Urban Planning at Fifty: An Assessment of the Planning Theory Literature Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 2000; 14(3): 347 - 366. [Abstract] [PDF]