This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wilks-Heeg, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Urban Experiments Limited Revisited: Urban Policy Comes Full Circle?

Local Economy Policy Unit, South Bank University, London SE1 OAA, UK

This article assesses the role of urban policy as a testing-ground for various policy experiments. In particular, it considers how the failure and controversy stemming from the property-led regeneration experiments of the 1980s have recently led to a major re-organisation of urban policy which appears to return to many of the principles embodied in the 1977 White Paper on the Inner Cities, itself a response to the failed experiments of the 1970s. This apparent circularity of policy is explained with reference to tensions which exist within and between the material, political and ideological contexts in which policy initiatives operate. As a result, urban policy is highly unstable, resulting in an alternation between periods of experimentation and periods of managerialist re-organisation.

Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 8, 1263-1279 (1996)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098966646


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Edwards Regeneration works? Disabled people and area-based urban renewal Critical Social Policy, November 1, 2009; 29(4): 613 - 633. [Abstract] [PDF]