Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loftman, P.
Right arrow Articles by Nevin, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 6, 991-1019 (1996)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989650011708

Going for Growth: Prestige Projects in Three British Cities

Patrick Loftman

Built Environment Development Centre, University of Central England in Birmingham, Perry Barr, Birmingham, B42 2SU, UK

Brendan Nevin

Built Environment Development Centre, University of Central England in Birmingham, Perry Barr, Birmingham, B42 2SU, UK

In response to the global restructuring of industry in the 1970s and 1980s, the elected governments of economically depressed cities have increasingly adopted growth-orientated local economic development policies. A key component of pro-growth local economic development strategies, adopted by UK city governments and central government agencies has been investment in, and promotion of, high-profile prestige property developments and civic boosterism activities. This paper provides a review of the local economic development responses of three UK local authorities (Birmingham, Sheffield and Manchester) to economic restructuring and the intensification of inter-city competition. Through an examination of the three case studies, the paper highlights: the debate concerning the validity of pro-growth, local economic development policies; the rationales behind the adoption of such policies; the financing and implementation of pro-growth strategies; economic impacts; and the distributional consequences of pro-growth strategies focused on prestige developments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. Henderson, S. Bowlby, and M. Raco
Refashioning Local Government and Inner-city Regeneration: The Salford Experience
Urban Stud, July 1, 2007; 44(8): 1441 - 1463.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
D. Hobbs, S. Winlow, P. Hadfield, and S. Lister
Violent Hypocrisy: Governance and the Night-time Economy
European Journal of Criminology, April 1, 2005; 2(2): 161 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
H. V. Savitch and P. Kantor
Urban Strategies for a Global Era: A Cross-National Comparison
American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 2003; 46(8): 1002 - 1033.
[Abstract] [PDF]