Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bassett, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3, 539-555 (1996)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989650011906
© 1996 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Partnerships, Business Elites and Urban Politics: New Forms of Governance in an English City?

Keith Bassett

Department of Geography, University of Brislol, University Road, Bristol, BS8 1SS, UK

This paper begins with a review of the conditions which have led to a proliferation of partnership arrangements in English cities and the related emergence of new business elites with interests in urban policy-making. The paper reviews a series of recent studies of these phenomena and comments on the importance of local economic and political factors in explaining inter-urban variations. The paper then presents an analysis of political and policy change in Bristol in the post-war period, tracing the factors that have accounted for the recent, if tardy, rapprochement between the political and business sectors and the launching of a widening array of partnership initiatives. An attempt is then made to explain these developments using a number of different theoretical frameworks, in particular growth coalition theory, urban regime theory, and policy network analysis. The paper concludes with some comments on the relation between these trends and the suggestion that we are witnessing a transition from a Fordist to a post-Fordist mode of regulation in English cities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Public Policy and AdministrationHome page
D. Peel and G. Lloyd
Re-generating Learning in the Public Realm: Evidence-based Policy Making and Business Improvement Districts in the UK
Public Policy and Administration, April 1, 2008; 23(2): 189 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
D. Hobbs, S. Winlow, P. Hadfield, and S. Lister
Violent Hypocrisy: Governance and the Night-time Economy
European Journal of Criminology, April 1, 2005; 2(2): 161 - 183.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
K. Mossberger and G. Stoker
The Evolution of Urban Regime Theory: The Challenge of Conceptualization
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2001; 36(6): 810 - 835.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
G. Haughton and A. While
From Corporate City to Citizens City?: Urban Leadership After Local Entrepreneurialism in the United Kingdom
Urban Affairs Review, September 1, 1999; 35(1): 3 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
K. Dowding, P. Dunleavy, D. King, H. Margetts, and Y. Rydin
Regime Politics in London Local Government
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 1999; 34(4): 515 - 545.
[Abstract] [PDF]