Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baldassare, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 3, 459-471 (1996)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989650011861
© 1996 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Changing Sources of Suburban Support for Local Growth Controls

Mark Baldassare

Department of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine. California, 92717, USA

Georjeanna Wilson

Department of Urban and Regional Planning, School of Social Ecology, University of California, Irvine. California, 92717, USA

Surveys conducted over time in the Orange County, CA, suburban region are used to test hypotheses about the predictors of support for local growth controls. Between 1982 and 1993, public support for local growth controls first increased and then declined. Negative community perceptions are consistently related to support for local growth controls, while higher municipal growth rates are never significant. Higher socio-economic status is related to support for stricter growth controls only at the early stage, while perceived rapid growth is a significant factor at later times. Personal characteristics that have been related to environmentalism (i.e. age, liberalism) become significant predictors of perceiving rapid growth in the latest stage. The changing sources of suburban support for local growth controls help to explain why previous studies taken at one point in time have contradictory findings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
A. F. Peterson, B. S. Kinsey, H. Bartling, and B. Baybeck
Bringing the Spatial In: The Case of the 2002 Seattle Monorail Referendum
Urban Affairs Review, January 1, 2008; 43(3): 403 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Politics ResearchHome page
E. R. Gerber and J. H. Phillips
Evaluating the Effects of Direct Democracy on Public Policy: California's Urban Growth Boundaries
American Politics Research, March 1, 2005; 33(2): 310 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]