Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doogan, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 2, 199-221 (1996)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989650011979
© 1996 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Labour Mobility and the Changing Housing Market

Kevin Doogan

School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Rodney Lodge, Grange Road, Bristol, BS8 4EA, UK

Labour mobility as a concept is not as straightforward as it first appears and has different meanings in different contexts. Mobility as a policy concern arose in Britain in the 1980s and assumed a particular form. It was often confined to a discussion of geographical movement between labour markets and the constraints imposed on potential job-seekers by their tenure position. Mobility can indeed be expressed in this way, but this captures only one aspect of job movement. At other times there are concerns with industrial and occupational mobility and notions such as job changing, labour turnover and flows also feature in employment policy discussions. This article raises the question as to whether mobility propensity is an attribute of the individual or the post that the employee might have or seek. The analysis offered here suggests the latter and accordingly an alternative explanation of labour and housing market interactions is provided. The article is written in five parts. It begins by critically assessing the neoclassical contribution to the discussion, followed by a brief review of the mobility debates over the last 50 years. It goes on to examine the involvement of employers in the housing market and studies the interaction of housing and labour markets in different phases of the business cycle. In conclusion, it is suggested that labour mobility is a structured opportunity determined by the level of employer assistance, the transferability of skills and qualifications, and the development of internal labour markets.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
D. Houston
Employability, Skills Mismatch and Spatial Mismatch in Metropolitan Labour Markets
Urban Stud, February 1, 2005; 42(2): 221 - 243.
[Abstract] [PDF]