Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malpezzi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Green, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 33, No. 10, 1807-1820 (1996)
DOI: 10.1080/0042098966385
© 1996 Urban Studies Journal Limited

What Has Happened to the Bottom of the US Housing Market?

Stephen Malpezzi

Center for Urban Land Economics Research, The School of Business, The University of Wisconsin, 975 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706-1323, USA, smalpezzi{at}bus.wisc.edu

Richard K. Green

Center for Urban Land Economics Research, The School of Business, The University of Wisconsin, 975 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706-1323, USA, rgreen{at}bus.wisc.edu.

Housing quality has improved dramatically for most low-income households, but they are paying much larger shares of their income for it. Many discussions of the bottom of the market focus on either the rising costs (the 'bad' news) or the rising quality (the 'good' news). Both points of view have some merit. This paper takes a positivist approach to the question: what's happening to the bottom of the housing market. We use a variety of indicators to look at whether the supply of low-cost units has fallen. We then focus on whether this dwindling supply reflects a market failure. If the market for low-income housing is indeed failing, we would observe: relatively high prices per unit of housing services provided by low-quality housing; obstructions to the supply of low-cost housing, which arises largely from filtering; and high vacancy rates. We find evidence of market failure in some markets but not in others. Finally, we focus on one possible source of market failure—excessive regulation—to see whether it is a common thread across those markets that have difficulty producing low-cost housing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
K. McClure
Deciphering the Need in Housing Markets: A Technique to Identify Appropriate Housing Policies at the Local Level
Journal of Planning Education and Research, June 1, 2005; 24(4): 361 - 378.
[Abstract] [PDF]