This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by North, D. Articles by Smallbone, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Employment Generation Potential of Mature SMEs in Different Geographical Environments

Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex University, Queensway, Enfield, Middlesex EN3 4SF, UK

David Smallbone

Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research, Middlesex University, Queensway, Enfield, Middlesex EN3 4SF, UK

Using a longitudinal database, this paper compares the employment performance over the 1979-90 period of mature SMEs in three contrasting geographical environments—i.e. London, outer metropolitan locations in the South East, and remote rural locations in northern England. The performance of SMEs in London locations is shown to be inferior to that of similar firms in remote rural locations, but this is found not to result from them having a weaker performance in output terms. Whilst it is the most rapidly growing firms which have the greatest employment generation potential in all locations, London-based SMEs are more likely to achieve growth in ways which minimise the number of additional workers employed directly by the firm. These urban-rural differences can be explained by the different 'strategies' for business growth adopted by managers in responding to the various opportunities and constraints existing in different geographical environments.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?