Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 9, 1489-1503 (1995)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989550012366
© 1995 Urban Studies Journal Limited

The Rent Gap Re-examined

Eric Clark

Institute of Geography, Copenhagen University, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark

Rent gap theory is re-examined in view of Bourassa's recent critique. The critique is found to be flawed on three accounts. It equates an abstract concept (actual land rent) with a concrete event (contract rent); it seeks the relevance of the rent gap at times of redevelopment; and it diminishes rent gap theory to an equation for calculating the profitability of redevelopment. In this re-examination, it is argued that: (1) actual land rent is not equal to contract rent; (2) the significance of the rent gap extends over a longer period prior to redevelopment; and (3) rent gap theory should not be reduced to a break-even point in real estate accounting. It is a political economic theory of uneven development on the urban scale and as such cannot be divorced from the societal relations and power struggles involved in the creation and capture of values in the built environment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
K. Beitel
Did Overzealous Activists Destroy Housing Affordability in San Francisco?: A Time-Series Test of the Effects of Rezoning on Construction and Home Prices, 1967--1998
Urban Affairs Review, May 1, 2007; 42(5): 741 - 756.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
J. Hackworth and J. Rekers
Ethnic Packaging and Gentrification: The Case of Four Neighborhoods in Toronto
Urban Affairs Review, November 1, 2005; 41(2): 211 - 236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
J. Hackworth
Postrecession Gentrification in New York City
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 2002; 37(6): 815 - 843.
[Abstract] [PDF]