Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gottlieb, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 9, 1413-1436 (1995)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989550012320
© 1995 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Residential Amenities, Firm Location and Economic Development

Paul D. Gottlieb

Center for Regional Economic Issues, Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7208, USA

Amenities are regarded as increasingly important to the location decisions of certain types of firm. Yet they are often ignored in economic development research because of the assumption that they attract only workers, and that this workforce, in turn, attracts firms. This paper argues for a reduced form model of the impact of amenities on corporate location. When testing such a model at the intra-metropolitan scale, it will be necessary to measure amenities not only at the potential worksite, but also where employees are likely to live. This paper tests such a firm location model using a sample of municipalities in northern New Jersey. Results support the hypothesis that firms evaluate certain amenities with respect to the likely residential locations of their employees.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Economic Development QuarterlyHome page
G. A. Erickcek and H. McKinney
"Small Cities Blues:" Looking for Growth Factors in Small and Medium-Sized Cities
Economic Development Quarterly, August 1, 2006; 20(3): 232 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Science Computer ReviewHome page
P. Waddell and A. Borning
A Case Study in Digital Government: Developing and Applying UrbanSim, a System for Simulating Urban Land Use, Transportation, and Environmental Impacts
Social Science Computer Review, February 1, 2004; 22(1): 37 - 51.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
J. Curran, L. Perren, P. Wver, and M. Fletcher
Abstracts and Commentaries
International Small Business Journal, July 1, 2001; 19(4): 87 - 99.
[PDF]


Home page
International Regional Science ReviewHome page
B. A. Mikelbank and R. W. Jackson
The Role of Space in Public Capital Research
International Regional Science Review, July 1, 2000; 23(3): 235 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]