Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bourassa, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 7, 1163-1173 (1995)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989550012627
© 1995 Urban Studies Journal Limited

The Impacts of Borrowing Constraints on Home-ownership in Australia

Steven C. Bourassa

Department of Property, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

The analysis reported in this article incorporates direct measures of borrowing constraints into an otherwise standard model of the home-ownership decision in Australia. Borrowing constraints take into account mortgage underwriting criteria, household incomes and wealth, and the household's optimal level of consumption of housing services. Models containing borrowing constraint measures are estimated for households with heads ages 25-34, the age-group that is most likely to be moving into home-ownership. Consistent with previous findings in the US and Canada, borrowing constraints are significant determinants of the probability of ownership. Including borrowing constraints in the tenure-choice model results in a reduction in the independent impacts of household income and the relative costs of owning and renting, implying that in the standard model these variables are at least in part proxies for borrowing constraints. As wealth is the binding constraint for most constrained renters, the article concludes that government programmes to encourage first-time buyers should focus on reducing deposit requirements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. C. Bourassa and Ming Yin
Tax Deductions, Tax Credits and the Homeownership Rate of Young Urban Adults in the United States
Urban Stud, May 1, 2008; 45(5-6): 1141 - 1161.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
J. Yates
Is Australia's Home-ownership Rate Really Stable? An Examination of Change between 1975 and 1994
Urban Stud, February 1, 2000; 37(2): 319 - 342.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
S. C. Bourassa
Measuring the Affordability of Home-ownership
Urban Stud, December 1, 1996; 33(10): 1867 - 1877.
[Abstract] [PDF]