Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willis, K.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 7, 1065-1079 (1995)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989550012573
© 1995 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Judging Development Control Decisions

K.G. Willis

Department of Town and Country Planning, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK

Development control decisions seek to ensure that planning applications conform to development plans and that environmental externalities are minimised. The cognitive continuum and lens models provide frameworks for describing how people make these development control decisions in practice under the Town and Country Planning Acts in England. A discrete choice decision model is developed to analyse the recommendations of the planning officer and the decisions of the planning committee, using planning applications to develop mineral deposits as a case example. The problem of a 'gold standard' is discussed against which decisions can be judged. The discrete choice model of planning decisions has a high success rate in predicting development control judgements. The results demonstrate that cue utilisation by subjects using intuitive decision methods is poor. Planning officers and committee members engage in differential dimension focus: whilst they believe in complexity, in reality their judgements depend upon just a few major variables.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Planning TheoryHome page
L. W.C. Lai and W. K.O. Ho
Using Probit Models in Planning Theory: An Illustration
Planning Theory, July 1, 2002; 1(2): 146 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]