This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by La Croix, S. J. Articles by Rose, L. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Political Economy of Urban Land Reform in Hawaii

Department of Ecoreomics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA

James Mak

Department of Ecoreomics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA

Louis A. Rose

Department of Ecoreomics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA

In the mid 1960s there were about 22 000 single-family leasehold homes in Honolulu. Dissatisfaction with leasehold led to reform legislation in 1967, allowing lessees to buy leased land. By 1991 less than 5000 lessees remained. This paper examines why landowners elected to lease rather than sell land and attributes the rise of leasehold to legal constraints on land sales by large estates, duties of estate trustees and the federal tax code. Ideological forces initiated land reform in 1967, but rent-seeking forces captured the process in the mid 1970s. It is concluded that Hawaii's experiment with leasehold was a failure due to the difficulties associated with specifying and enforcing long-term contracts in residential land.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?