|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Rethinking the Economics of Location and Agglomeration
Philip McCann
Regional Science Department, University of Pennsylvania, 130 McNeil Building, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6209, USA
Fundamental problems exist with the classical characterisation of agglomeration economies, since such definitions do not reflect the various cost issues on which firms may wish to economise. A lack of understanding of the relationship between the notions of market hierarchies and locational behaviour leads to confusion not only in applied economic interpretation, but more fundamentally in the construction of theoretical location models. In particular, neo-classical location theory can be shown to be crucially flawed as a basis for spatial analysis. This paper therefore attempts to provide an alternative definition of the various types of agglomeration economies such that the various strands of economic theory might be used in a more rigorous manner in the discussion of spatial increasing returns.
Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3,
563-577 (1995)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989550012979

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Holl
A Review of the Firm-Level Role of Transport Infrastructure with Implications for Transport Project Evaluation
Journal of Planning Literature,
August 1, 2006;
21(1):
3 - 14.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. B. Parr
Missing Elements in the Analysis of Agglomeration Economies
International Regional Science Review,
April 1, 2002;
25(2):
151 - 168.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Simmie and J. Sennett
Innovative clusters: global or local linkages?
National Institute Economic Review,
October 1, 1999;
170(1):
87 - 98.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Malmberg
Industrial geography: agglomeration and local milieu
Progress in Human Geography,
September 1, 1996;
20(3):
392 - 403.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. McCann
On Regional Science: Some Thoughts from a Recent Observer
International Regional Science Review,
April 1, 1995;
18(2):
249 - 252.
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|