Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ter Borg, E.
Right arrow Articles by Dijkink, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1, 49-67 (1995)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989550013211
© 1995 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Naturalising Choices and Neutralising Voices? Discourse on Urban Development in Two Cities

Elisabeth ter Borg

Department of Human Geography, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130, 1018 VZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Gertjan Dijkink

Department of Human Geography, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Prinsengracht 130, 1018 VZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Post-modern conceptions of social projects stress the closed nature of the communications involved (discourse). Philosophers in this tradition have presented discourse procedures and power relations as forces constraining the possibilities of expression and change. Two aspects have been selected in this article to examine the appropriateness of the discourse perspective with regard to urban development policy: discontinuity and compulsiveness. An analysis of shifting policy aims in two cities affirms the presence of several features assigned to discourses. Both cities represent different positions on a continuum between more and less disciplined (closed) discourse. Critical voices, however, are never completely absent; they only operate at different distances from the inner political circle.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?