Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pichler-Milanovich, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 31, No. 7, 1097-1115 (1994)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989420080971
© 1994 Urban Studies Journal Limited

The Role of Housing Policy in the Transformation Process of Central-East European Cities

Natasha Pichler-Milanovich

European Urban Observatory, X303 St Philips, London School of Economics, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, UK

This paper is concerned with a process of housing privatisation and urban revitalisation in the transformation of central-east European cities. Today central-east Europe is approaching the political and economic system that prevails in western Europe. Reforms require the extensive privatisation of firms as well as land and housing. The housing privatisation process includes changing the ownership and management of the housing stock, and a new system of housing finance. These processes will influence new housing construction and the modernisation and rehabilitation of the existing housing stock. The change in housing policy and the increasing polarisation within society may result in transformation of the social and physical structure of the city. Larger and, especially, capital cities in central-east Europe are the most attractive locations for business investments and property development, but consequences can be highly selective. Despite dominant or privileged positions in national and, increasingly, international economies, cities could face certain problems in the future with social polarisation, residential segregation, decentralisation of economic activities and rising unemployment. Therefore, the question is: will housing privatisation in central-east European cities lead to better chances for rehabilitation or just the opposite? Housing privatisation in central-east European cities will have an impact on gentrification and the rehabilitation of older housing areas in inner cities, within the context of political and economic restructuring, urban planning policies and the dynamics of the real estate market. All these factors will determine the future of housing and urban development. The availability of funds will be one of the main questions for the future rehabilitation process in central-east European cities. Another important factor will be the degree to which urban governments become proactive. An innovative housing and urban policy and, a policy and technical 'know-how' assistance from western Europe might well be a success.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
K. Hoggart
All washed up and nowhere to go? Public policy and geographical research
Progress in Human Geography, March 1, 1996; 20(1): 110 - 122.
[PDF]