Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 31, No. 7, 1033-1042 (1994)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989420080931
© 1994 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Towards a Copenhagen Interpretation of Gentrification

Eric Clark

Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen, øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark

In the social sciences, and particularly in gentrification research, there seems to be a persistent fascination with, and an urge to pursue a course towards synthesising, integrating or uniting very different approaches into a single comprehensive explanation. One concept often raised in this context is complementarity (associated with Bohr's 'Copenhagen interpretation' of quantum mechanics), though usually in an unreflective and uncritical manner. The purposes of this paper are to outline the concept of complementarity; to clarify what we should be careful not to ascribe to the concept; and to provide a rough sketch of what a Copenhagen interpretation of gentrification would involve. It is argued that while it is a worthy task to strive for integration and synthesis in comprehensive thick descriptions, we will have to accept that the theoretical bases for our understanding of various aspects included in these studies may not be so easy to unite into one unambiguous and internally consistent theoretical construct.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?