This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Giuliano, G. Articles by Small, K. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Is the Journey to Work Explained by Urban Structure?

School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Southern California, University Park, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA

Kenneth A. Small

Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine, USA

Basic to several key issues in current urban economic theory and public policy is a presumption that local imbalances between employment and residential sites strongly influence people's commuting patterns. We examine this presumption by finding the commuting pattern for the Los Angeles region in 1980 which would minimise average commuting time or distance, given the actual spatial distributions of job and housing locations. We find that the amount of commuting required by these distributions is far less than actual commuting, and that variations in required commuting across job locations only weakly explain variations in actual commuting. We conclude that other factors must be more important to location decisions than commuting cost, and that policies aimed at changing the jobs-housing balance will have only a minor effect on commuting.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. W. Horner `Optimal' Accessibility Landscapes? Development of a New Methodology for Simulating and Assessing Jobs--Housing Relationships in Urban Regions Urban Stud, July 1, 2008; 45(8): 1583 - 1602. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Moos and A. Skaburskis The Probability of Single-family Dwelling Occupancy: Comparing Home Workers and Commuters in Canadian Cities Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2008; 27(3): 319 - 340. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Kawabata and Q. Shen Commuting Inequality between Cars and Public Transit: The Case of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1990-2000 Urban Stud, August 1, 2007; 44(9): 1759 - 1780. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. L. Margulis Commercial Sub-markets in Suburban Cuyahoga County, Ohio Urban Stud, February 1, 2007; 44(2): 249 - 274. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Niedzielski A Spatially Disaggregated Approach to Commuting Efficiency Urban Stud, December 1, 2006; 43(13): 2485 - 2502. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K.-R. Ma and D. Banister Extended Excess Commuting: A Measure of the Jobs-Housing Imbalance in Seoul Urban Stud, October 1, 2006; 43(11): 2099 - 2113. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. A. Rodriguez, F. Targa, and S. A. Aytur Transport Implications of Urban Containment Policies: A Study of the Largest Twenty-five US Metropolitan Areas Urban Stud, September 1, 2006; 43(10): 1879 - 1897. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Aguilera Growth in Commuting Distances in French Polycentric Metropolitan Areas: Paris, Lyon and Marseille Urban Stud, August 1, 2005; 42(9): 1537 - 1547. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Levine, A. Inam, and G.-W. Torng A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation Alternatives: Evidence from Boston and Atlanta Journal of Planning Education and Research, March 1, 2005; 24(3): 317 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Cervero and M. Duncan Neighbourhood Composition and Residential Land Prices: Does Exclusion Raise or Lower Values? Urban Stud, February 1, 2004; 41(2): 299 - 315. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Stone Jr. Air Quality by Design: Harnessing the Clean Air Act to Manage Metropolitan Growth Journal of Planning Education and Research, December 1, 2003; 23(2): 177 - 190. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Garcia and P. Riera Expansion versus Density in Barcelona: A Valuation Exercise Urban Stud, September 1, 2003; 40(10): 1925 - 1936. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. M. Dieleman, M. Dijst, and G. Burghouwt Urban Form and Travel Behaviour: Micro-level Household Attributes and Residential Context Urban Stud, March 1, 2002; 39(3): 507 - 527. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. W. Horner and A. T. Murray Excess Commuting and the Modifiable Areal Unit Problem Urban Stud, January 1, 2002; 39(1): 131 - 139. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Crane The Influence of Urban Form on Travel: An Interpretive Review Journal of Planning Literature, August 1, 2000; 15(1): 3 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Filion, T. Bunting, and K. Warriner The Entrenchment of Urban Dispersion: Residential Preferences and Location Patterns in the Dispersed City Urban Stud, July 1, 1999; 36(8): 1317 - 1347. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Giuliano Information Technology, Work Patterns and Intra-metropolitan Location: A Case Study Urban Stud, June 1, 1998; 35(7): 1077 - 1095. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z.-R. Peng The Jobs-Housing Balance and Urban Commuting Urban Stud, July 1, 1997; 34(8): 1215 - 1235. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. C. Pratt Coordinating Employment, Transport and Housing in Cities: An Institutional Perspective Urban Stud, October 1, 1996; 33(8): 1357 - 1375. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Naess and S. L. Sandberg Workplace Location, Modal Split and Energy Use for Commuting Trips Urban Stud, April 1, 1996; 33(3): 557 - 580. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. P. Anderson, P. S. Kanaroglou, and E. J. Miller Urban Form, Energy and the Environment: A Review of Issues, Evidence and Policy Urban Stud, February 1, 1996; 33(1): 7 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Cervero Planned Communities, Self-containment and Commuting: A Cross-national Perspective Urban Stud, August 1, 1995; 32(7): 1135 - 1161. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Merriman, T. Ohkawara, and T. Suzuki Excess Commuting in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area: Measurement and Policy Simulations Urban Stud, February 1, 1995; 32(1): 69 - 85. [Abstract] [PDF]