This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Barnekov, T. Articles by Hart, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Changing Nature of US Urban Policy Evaluation: The Case of the Urban Development Action Grant

Center for Energy and Urban Policy Research, College of Urban Affairs and Public Policy, University of Delaware, USA

Douglas Hart

Department of Land Management and Development, Faculty of Urban and Regional Studies, University of Reading, P.O. Box 219, Reading RG6 2BU, UK

A good deal was written about the success of American urban economic initiatives in the 1960s and 1970s. Often, however, claims were made by a particular programme's proponents about that programme's benefits without those benefits being independently assessed. As a consequence, in the late 1970s and early 1980s urban policy evaluation grew significantly as a governmental activity. But by the late 1980s policy evaluation was in general retreat. This paper seeks to analyse why this occurred and concludes that the decline in support for evaluation happened for a variety of reasons, including, in particular, its perceived lack of utility for policy-makers and, relatedly, its lack of effectiveness in actually informing either policy or practice. To illustrate the kind of problems which beset policy evaluation, the Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) was selected as a case-study, on the grounds that UDAG formed the centrepiece of urban economic development policy in America for almost a decade from 1979 to 1988. The paper goes on to suggest that the problems associated with assessing the UDAG programme were often more ideological rather than simply financial or technical. It is argued that as a consequence, formal, publicly available, urban policy evaluation has been steadily abandoned at both the federal and city levels in the US.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. F. Buss The Effect of State Tax Incentives on Economic Growth and Firm Location Decisions: An Overview of the Literature Economic Development Quarterly, February 1, 2001; 15(1): 90 - 105. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. F. Buss and L. C. Yancer Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Normative Perspective Economic Development Quarterly, February 1, 1999; 13(1): 29 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Talen Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 1996; 10(3): 248 - 259. [Abstract]