Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bourne, L.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Close Together and Worlds Apart: An Analysis of Changes in the Ecology of Income in Canadian Cities

L.S. Bourne

Centre for Urban and Community Studies and Department of Geography, University of Toronto, 100 St George Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5S 1A1

The volatile social status of older neighbourhoods has been a concern of both scholars and politicians for some time. Three competing hypotheses, representing different interpretations of past trends and contrasting scenarios for the future, have dominated recent research: the impoverishment (decline), élite (gentrified) and persistence (stability) models. This paper examines these three models with respect to changing income distributions between and within Canadian metropolitan areas and their inner cities from 1950 to 1985. All three hypotheses are found to be wanting. It is shown that the direction of change in inner cities differs markedly among the metropolitan areas, and that while inner-city-suburban contrasts continue to grow in most cities, in a few places these contrasts are overwhelmed by internal diversity and by new clusters of suburban poverty and inner-city wealth. The emerging ecology of income and social status is much more complex and variable than any single hypothesis or research paradigm can encompass.

Urban Studies, Vol. 30, No. 8, 1293-1317 (1993)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989320081271


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M. Stafford, P. Martikainen, E. Lahelma, and M. Marmot
Neighbourhoods and self rated health: a comparison of public sector employees in London and Helsinki
J Epidemiol Community Health, September 1, 2004; 58(9): 772 - 778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of Comparative SociologyHome page
K. M. Gorey
Prevalent Low Income Status in Canadian and United States Metropolitan Areas, 1980 and 1990
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, December 1, 1998; 39(4): 378 - 383.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
S. Chakravorty
Urban Inequality Revisited: The Determinants of Income Distribution in U.S. Metropolitan Areas
Urban Affairs Review, July 1, 1996; 31(6): 759 - 777.
[Abstract]