Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davies, W. K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Donoghue, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 30, No. 7, 1165-1186 (1993)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989320081111
© 1993 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Economic Diversification and Group Stability in an Urban System: The Case of Canada, 1951-86

Wayne K. D. Davies

Department of Geography, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N IN4

Daniel P. Donoghue

Department of Geography, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N IN4

Researchers have shown relatively little recent interest in the study of the economic diversification and classification of urban systems. If we are to understand contemporary urban structures, older studies must be brought up to date. This study of the economic character of towns greater than 30 000 in Canada demonstrates the degree of diversification of the centres between 1951 and 1986 and provides a succinct classification of the centres. The expected decrease in the general level of diversification between the two dates is complemented by the finding that differences in this single summary measure between the regions of Canada can no longer be found. Cluster analysis procedures are used to derive seven groups of places in 1986, which are very similar to the categories found in 1951, even though there has been a transformation in the size and economy of the places. This relative stability in the categories of places is parallelled by similarities in the membership of the groups. However, at the most fundamental level the urban system can be still be separated into service as opposed to production centres, a rather surprising dichotomy in view of the changes in urban economies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
M. Hoesli, C. Lizieri, and B. MacGregor
The Spatial Dimensions of the Investment Performance of UK Commercial Property
Urban Stud, August 1, 1997; 34(9): 1475 - 1494.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
W. K. D. Davies and I. J. Townshend
How Do Community Associations Vary? The Structure of Community Associations in Calgary, Alberta
Urban Stud, December 1, 1994; 31(10): 1739 - 1761.
[Abstract] [PDF]