Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lever, W.F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 30, No. 6, 935-948 (1993)
DOI: 10.1080/00420989320080871
© 1993 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Competition within the European Urban System

W.F. Lever

Department of Social and Economic Research, Adam Smith Building, University of Glasgow, 40 Bute Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK

The diminishing importance of national frontiers in western Europe has intensified competition between cities for mobile investment, for the location of public institutions and for hallmark events. This has led to the creation of league tables of cities in which rankings are determined by single or multiple variables. Analyses of changes in rankings focus on whether there has been divergence or convergence amongst European cities. This paper uses data on 117 cities to suggest that there was convergence in 1981-84, followed by divergence in 1984-87. The paper goes on to test three hypotheses which relate urban economic growth to size or capital status, to location within the core or periphery, and location within northern or southern Europe. Overall it finds that capital cities grow more quickly, in economic terms; that the urban south is catching up with the urban north; and that, whilst the cities of the core did best before 1985, there is some evidence that 'crowding out' has relatively helped the cities of the periphery since 1985.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
A. Bailly, C. Jensen-Butler, and L. Leontidou
Changing Cities: Restructuring, Marginality and Policies in Urban Europe
European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 1996; 3(2): 161 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
G. Hallin and A. Malmberg
Attraction, Competition and Regional Development in Europe
European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 1996; 3(4): 323 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Urban and Regional StudiesHome page
P. Sjoholt
The Role of Producer Services in Industrial and Regional Development: The Nordic Case
European Urban and Regional Studies, January 1, 1994; 1(2): 115 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]