Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheshire, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sheppard, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 26, No. 5, 469-485 (1989)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988920080541
© 1989 Urban Studies Journal Limited

British Planning Policy and Access to Housing: Some Empirical Estimates

Paul Cheshire

Department of Economics at the University of Reading

Stephen Sheppard

Department of Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

There is evidence that the implementation of the planning system creates 'scarcity rents' for land in different uses by acting as a constraint on land supply. This paper provides, for 1984, estimates of the effects this has on house prices, on residential densities and on access to owner occupation. In turn these generate estimates of the extent to which urban development would spread in the South East if the planning system were operated in a way which had no restrictive effect on the built-up area. We draw on the results of a wider study of the economic consequences of the planning system. Our estimates are derived from a detailed analysis of the land and property markets in two English cities, selected to be at the polar extremes of planning restrictiveness but as similar as possible in other respects. Household surveys were used to generate the data necessary to standardise for factors conventional urban economic theory suggests would lead to demand differences between them, to provide quantitative estimates of the effects of the supply restrictions produced by the operation of the planning system.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
WORLD BANK RES OBSHome page
R. M. Buckley and J. Kalarickal
Housing Policy in Developing Countries: Conjectures and Refutations
World Bank Res. Obs., September 1, 2005; 20(2): 233 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
G. Knaap
The Determinants of Residential Property Values: Implications for Metropolitan Planning
Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 1998; 12(3): 267 - 282.
[Abstract]