Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Urban Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooperstein, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Quantifying the Decision to Become a First-Time Home Buyer

Richard L. Cooperstein

United States Office of Management & Budget, New Executive Office Building, Rm. 9002, Washington, DC 2053, USA

Becoming a first-time homebuyer is quantified in two stages using household data. A renter demand curve is estimated to calculate the consumer surplus gain from moving into housing consumption equilibrium. Probit is used to estimate the probability of becoming a first-time homebuyer. The model suggests that overcoming the transactions cost of buying, and the gain from housing consumption equilibrium are important to the decision.

Renting is explained by current housing demand through income and family size. Buying for the first time is explained by factors which reduce transactions costs, such as assets, marital status, and education. Disequilibrium in rental housing consumption is also important. The results further suggest that permanent income is not important to the decision.

Urban Studies, Vol. 26, No. 2, 223-233 (1989)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988920080191


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?