Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgess, J.
Right arrow Articles by Limb, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 25, No. 6, 455-473 (1988)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988820080631
© 1988 Urban Studies Journal Limited

People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City

Jacquelin Burgess

Department of Geography, University College London

Carolyn M. Harrison

Department of Geography, University College London

Melanie Limb

Department of Geography, University College London

Contemporary provision of open spaces within cities rests largely on professional assumptions about its significance in the lives of residents. This paper presents results from the Greenwich Open Space Project which used qualitative research with four, in-depth discussion groups to determine the design of a questionnaire survey of households in the borough. The research shows that the most highly valued open spaces are those which enhance the positive qualities of urban life : variety of opportunities and physical settings; sociability and cultural diversity. The findings lend some support to the approach of the urban conservation movement but present a fundamental challenge to the open-space hierarchy embodied in the Greater London Development Plan. The Project identifies a great need for diversity of both natural settings and social facilities within local areas and highlights the potential of urban green space to improve the quality of life of all citizens.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
H. Frumkin
Healthy Places: Exploring the Evidence
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2003; 93(9): 1451 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
B. FISCHHOFF
Public Values in Risk Research
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 1, 1996; 545(1): 75 - 84.
[Abstract]


Home page
Journal of Planning Education and ResearchHome page
A. Loukaitou-Sideris
Urban Form and Social Context: Cultural Differentiation in the Uses of Urban Parks
Journal of Planning Education and Research, January 1, 1995; 14(2): 89 - 102.
[Abstract]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
D. Cosgrove
Orders and a new world: cultural geography 1990-91
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 1992; 16(2): 272 - 280.
[PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
J. Burgess, C. Harrison, and P. Maiteny
Contested meanings: the consumption of news about nature conservation
Media Culture Society, October 1, 1991; 13(4): 499 - 519.