Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glasson, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3, 248-261 (1988)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988820080331
© 1988 Urban Studies Journal Limited

A Local Income and Employment Multiplier Analysis of a Proposed Nuclear Power Station Development at Hinkley Point in Somerset

John Glasson

School of Planning, Oxford Polytechnic and Director of the Power Station Impacts (PSI) Project

Dominique van Der Wee

Regional Policy Directorate of the European Commission

Brendan Barrett

University of Kyoto

Nuclear power stations have a range of local economic implications for their host localities; some direct through local employment on the development, others more indirect resulting from the filtering through into the local community of income and expenditure. This paper focusses on the indirect effects, using a disaggregated dynamic multiplier approach. The case study used is that of the proposed Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) nuclear power station development at Hinkley Point in Somerset, England. The analysis highlights the significance of the indirect effects and the importance of disaggregation by expenditure category and over time. A particularly important distinction is that between the indirect effects associated with the construction stage of the development and with the operational stage.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban StudHome page
H. W. Armstrong
The Local Income and Employment Impact of Lancaster University
Urban Stud, December 1, 1993; 30(10): 1653 - 1668.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Urban StudHome page
P. Coomes, D. Olson, and J. Merchant
Using a Metropolitan-area Econometric Model to Analyse Economic Development Proposals
Urban Stud, June 1, 1991; 28(3): 369 - 382.
[Abstract] [PDF]