Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardson, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, 227-244 (1987)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988720080361
© 1987 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Whither National Urban Policy in Developing Countries?

Harry W. Richardson

State University of New York, Albany, University of Southern California, Los Angeles

Most attempts to implement national urban policies in developing countries have failed. The causes of failure have been many (infeasible goals, poor implementation, poorly designed policies) but the most difficult problem has been the isolation of national urban policy from national economic planning and from the overall context of macroeconomic and sectoral policies. National policy should not be equated with slowing down urbanization; if so, it will be ineffective in early developing countries and unnecessary in late developing and developed countries. It should not be defined largely as a primacy problem, because the issue is not whether the primate city is too big but rather how will primate city growth be managed. The resource costs of urbanization absorb a very high proportion of the available investment pool, but many of the policy implications are non-spatial (e.g. reducing standards, promoting savings) rather than spatial (e.g. changing the pattern of urbanization). Urban development should be treated as a horizontal slice cutting across almost all sectors rather than as a vertical sector in itself. This may require institutional reorganization at the central government level. Policy innovations should aim for much closer integration between urban development policy and national development planning and give less emphasis to independently conceived spatial policy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
D. Ioannides
Planning for International Tourism in Less Developed Countries: Toward Sustainability?
Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 1995; 9(3): 235 - 254.
[Abstract]


Home page
International Regional Science ReviewHome page
P. M. Townroe
The Case for Experimental, Adaptive Restraint Policies in Developing Nation Metropolitan Areas
International Regional Science Review, August 1, 1989; 12(2): 131 - 146.
[Abstract] [PDF]