Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singell, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Lillydahl, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 23, No. 2, 119-129 (1986)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988620080111
© 1986 Urban Studies Journal Limited

An Empirical Analysis of the Commute to Work Patterns of Males and Females in Two-Earner Households

Larry D. Singell

Department of Economics at the University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309

Jane H. Lillydahl

Department of Economics at the University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309

The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the proposition that residential decisions are made with reference to the male head of household's job location, disadvantaging females in the labor market. A sample of approximately 50,000 adults in two-earner households in urban areas distributed across the United States is selected from public use microdata from the 1980 census and used to estimate a simultaneous model to explain commute to work behavior of men and women. The model is estimated separately for households that did and did not change residences in the past year. The impacts of the new residences on the commute times of both male and female workers, holding other variables constant, are compared. We conclude that residential selection does favor males relative to females, although there is evidence that this advantage is eliminated as the ratio of female to male earnings in the same household narrows.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
E. Blumenberg and M. Manville
Beyond the Spatial Mismatch: Welfare Recipients and Transportation Policy
Journal of Planning Literature, November 1, 2004; 19(2): 182 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
H. I. MacDonald
Women's Employment and Commuting: Explaining the Links
Journal of Planning Literature, February 1, 1999; 13(3): 267 - 283.
[Abstract] [PDF]