Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DeGiovanni, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, 245-259 (1984)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988420080521
© 1984 Urban Studies Journal Limited

An Examination of Selected Consequences of Revitalization in Six US Cities

Frank F. DeGiovanni

Department of City and Regional Planning, Pratt Institute, Brooklyn, New York

This paper examines four selected consequences of private market revitalization in 12 neighborhoods in six US cities. The analysis reveals that the physical quality of properties has been improved significantly, property assessments have increased substantially, and the investment in the properties by newcomers to the neighborhoods has encouraged original owners to improve their properties in one-third of the neighborhoods studied. However, the increase in assessed values generally has lagged far behind increases in the market value of the properties. Reinvestment also appears to have generated negative consequences. Many of the renters living in the neighborhoods prior to the start of reinvestment, many of whom had a low socioeconomic status, may have been displaced. In addition, the assessed value of properties owned by persons living in the neighborhoods prior to revitalization and not improved during revitalization increased as a result of the changes occurring in the neighborhoods. The percentage increase in the assessed value of these properties was not significantly less than the increase for properties improved by newcomers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?