Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hodge, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, 219-231 (1984)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988420080501
© 1984 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Spatial Differentials in Residential Displacement

Barrett A. Lee

Department of Sociology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee

David C. Hodge

Department of Geography, the University of Washington, Seattle

Because existing research treats residential displacement as a consequence of housing market conditions associated with the urban core, the incidence of displacement is thought to be greater in: (1) metropolitan areas than nonmetropolitan areas, (2) the 'urban heartland' than other regions of the country, (3) central cities than suburbs, and (4) older, inner-city neighborhoods than younger, peripheral ones. Data from the US Annual Housing Survey are analyzed and case studies of individual cities are reviewed to test these four spatial hypotheses. While the strength of the evidence favoring the hypotheses depends in part upon the type of displacement rate employed, spatial contrasts in displacement generally appear to be less marked than the literature suggests. We attribute the lack of convincing support for the hypotheses to housing market pressures operating at the national level that generate involuntary mobility across all geographical sectors of the population.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Urban Affairs ReviewHome page
L. Freeman
Displacement or Succession?: Residential Mobility in Gentrifying Neighborhoods
Urban Affairs Review, March 1, 2005; 40(4): 463 - 491.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
P. Gober
Urban housing demography
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 1992; 16(2): 171 - 189.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Planning LiteratureHome page
D. Gale
Demographic Research on Gentrlfication and Displacement
Journal of Planning Literature, January 1, 1985; 1(1): 14 - 29.
[Abstract]