Urban Studies

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillingham, R.
Right arrow Articles by Greenlees, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Urban Studies, Vol. 18, No. 3, 365-369 (1981)
DOI: 10.1080/00420988120080661
© 1981 Urban Studies Journal Limited

Estimating Inter-city Differences in the Price of Housing Services: Further Evidence 1

Robert Gillingham

Division of Price and Index Number Research, Office of Prices and Living Conditions, US Bureau of Labor Statistics

John S. Greenlees

Division of Price and Index Number Research, Office of Prices and Living Conditions, US Bureau of Labor Statistics

This paper reconsiders an approach to inter-area house price index construction applied by Harvey Rosen in a recent article in Urban Studies. Rosen's cost function-based approach is shown to rely upon certain implicit assumptions regarding consumer preferences and housing production technology. Using FHA home purchase data, we estimate a more general production model and generate alternative inter-area indexes. Based on our results, Rosen's production technology assumptions are rejected. Further, the production-theoretic indexes are shown to differ only negligibly from a fixed-weight index using FHA data. Thus the difference which Rosen finds between the production-theoretic FHA and published BLS indexes does not result from Rosen's recognition of substitution in production, but because of very different data sources and scopes of coverage.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?